March 21st, 2010 at 4:59 pm
Conservatives and Republicans today suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s.
It’s hard to exaggerate the magnitude of the disaster. Conservatives may cheer themselves that they’ll compensate for today’s expected vote with a big win in the November 2010 elections. But:
(1) It’s a good bet that conservatives are over-optimistic about November – by then the economy will have improved and the immediate goodies in the healthcare bill will be reaching key voting blocs.
(2) So what? Legislative majorities come and go. This healthcare bill is forever. A win in November is very poor compensation for this debacle now.
So far, I think a lot of conservatives will agree with me. Now comes the hard lesson:
A huge part of the blame for today’s disaster attaches to conservatives and Republicans ourselves.
At the beginning of this process we made a strategic decision: unlike, say, Democrats in 2001 when President Bush proposed his first tax cut, we would make no deal with the administration. No negotiations, no compromise, nothing. We were going for all the marbles. This would be Obama’s Waterloo – just as healthcare was Clinton’s in 1994.
Only, the hardliners overlooked a few key facts: Obama was elected with 53% of the vote, not Clinton’s 42%. The liberal block within the Democratic congressional caucus is bigger and stronger than it was in 1993-94. And of course the Democrats also remember their history, and also remember the consequences of their 1994 failure.
This time, when we went for all the marbles, we ended with none.
Could a deal have been reached? Who knows? But we do know that the gap between this plan and traditional Republican ideas is not very big. The Obama plan has a broad family resemblance to Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan. It builds on ideas developed at the Heritage Foundation in the early 1990s that formed the basis for Republican counter-proposals to Clintoncare in 1993-1994.
Barack Obama badly wanted Republican votes for his plan. Could we have leveraged his desire to align the plan more closely with conservative views? To finance it without redistributive taxes on productive enterprise – without weighing so heavily on small business – without expanding Medicaid? Too late now. They are all the law.
No illusions please: This bill will not be repealed. Even if Republicans scored a 1994 style landslide in November, how many votes could we muster to re-open the “doughnut hole” and charge seniors more for prescription drugs? How many votes to re-allow insurers to rescind policies when they discover a pre-existing condition? How many votes to banish 25 year olds from their parents’ insurance coverage? And even if the votes were there – would President Obama sign such a repeal?
We followed the most radical voices in the party and the movement, and they led us to abject and irreversible defeat.
There were leaders who knew better, who would have liked to deal. But they were trapped. Conservative talkers on Fox and talk radio had whipped the Republican voting base into such a frenzy that deal-making was rendered impossible. How do you negotiate with somebody who wants to murder your grandmother? Or – more exactly – with somebody whom your voters have been persuaded to believe wants to murder their grandmother?
I’ve been on a soapbox for months now about the harm that our overheated talk is doing to us. Yes it mobilizes supporters – but by mobilizing them with hysterical accusations and pseudo-information, overheated talk has made it impossible for representatives to represent and elected leaders to lead. The real leaders are on TV and radio, and they have very different imperatives from people in government. Talk radio thrives on confrontation and recrimination. When Rush Limbaugh said that he wanted President Obama to fail, he was intelligently explaining his own interests. What he omitted to say – but what is equally true – is that he also wants Republicans to fail. If Republicans succeed – if they govern successfully in office and negotiate attractive compromises out of office – Rush’s listeners get less angry. And if they are less angry, they listen to the radio less, and hear fewer ads for Sleepnumber beds.
So today’s defeat for free-market economics and Republican values is a huge win for the conservative entertainment industry. Their listeners and viewers will now be even more enraged, even more frustrated, even more disappointed in everybody except the responsibility-free talkers on television and radio. For them, it’s mission accomplished. For the cause they purport to represent, it’s Waterloo all right: ours.
Source: http://www.frumforum.com/waterloo
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Search This Blog
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(232)
-
▼
March
(50)
- Chad Strawderman's "The Deep End" 2
- Chad Strawderman's "The Deep End" 1
- David Frum, "Waterloo"
- Unintelligent Design
- Another ominous sign: Republicans reserve the righ...
- Has the Republican Party lost its soul?
- And this is the problem
- Sigur Ros, "Saeglopur"
- Drain the Swamp
- Why boards of education shouldn't write textbooks
- The Chickens come home to roost
- Wolf at RedState attempts to school Carson and Lew...
- I have an idea
- Perhaps this bill would apply to Lieberman and McCain
- Why we need a consumer protection agency
- The Pro-life argument for health care reform
- Parts & Labor, "Wedding in a Wasteland," "Nowheres...
- Aboombong: Asynchronic
- When all else fails, go after the orphan
- Help for Democrats addicted to polls
- Health care reform angers imaginary Americans
- The New McCarthyites
- Erickson at RedState favors politicization of the ...
- Polvo, "Beggar's Bowl"
- Marc Thiessen's alarming and embarrassing performa...
- A Bill that even Republicans can read
- The Revision Thing
- The Evpatoria Report, "Taijin Kyofusho"
- My pick for Best Original Score
- Where to find textbooks for your private little Ma...
- The Race to the Bottom
- "The fault . . . is not in our stars, but in ourse...
- The Killers, "For Reasons Unknown"
- The Redistribution of Wealth
- Public Enemy No. 1
- Sen. Byrd's reply to barkings from Glenbeckistan
- RedState, Abortion, and the Senate Health Care Bill
- RedState's incoherent take on the torture memo law...
- Electric Light Orchestra, "Ordinary Dream"
- Ratigan shows us how to look worse than the guest ...
- A bunch of freaking idiots
- A Brief History of Senate Reconciliation Votes
- What to do when you ain't got nothin'
- When did Republicans turn into a cowering bunch of...
- James Traub: "What Happened to New York's Moxie?"
- RedState's contempt for its readers apparent in ca...
- Doubleplusungood
- RedState stuck on spin cycle
- To hell with due process, let's kill some people!
- Republicans take their ball and go home
-
▼
March
(50)
Followers
What I'm Following
-
-
-
-
-
-
the best laid plans1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
This feed has moved and will be deleted soon. Please update your subscription now.3 years ago
-
Believe4 years ago
-
Search4 years ago
-
-
The Blog Moves On6 years ago
-
Our Home7 years ago
-
Soup has moved and improved!!!8 years ago
-
-
-
-
Announcing INSIGHT at Skeptic.com10 years ago
-
-
-
-
For your further edification and amusement
- Catan
- Collative Learning: Film Reviews and Analysis by Rob Ager
- DGM Live
- Gospel of Inclusion
- Green Party of the United States
- Mystery Science Theater 3000
- Pandora Radio
- Prog Archives
- Rip Rowan, "Over The Limit"
- Skepticblog: Ten Major Flaws of Evolution: A Refutation
- Slate Magazine
- Slayage: The Online International Journal of Buffy Studies
- South Park Studios
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Star Trek
- Teeccino
- The Baseball Scorecard
- The Onion
- The World's Biggest Pac-Man
- Turn Me Up!
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. ---W.K. Clifford
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear. ---Thomas Jefferson
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear. ---Thomas Jefferson
Did Frum know his "Waterloo" piece would be his own "Waterloo" with the GOP-Republican Party? I wonder if he was looking to get kicked out of cool kids club.
ReplyDelete