According to Jacob Weisberg, Medicare Part D, passed by Republicans in 2003, will cost $1.2 trillion over ten years and was financed entirely by deficit spending. The Senate health care reform bill costs $848 billion and will not add to the deficit. And yet Republicans are against it. Sen. Charles Grassley is opposed to it on the grounds that it "expands the deficit, threatens Medicare, and does too little to restrain health care inflation." Weisberg infers from these facts that the Republicans' complaints about health care reform are "disingenuous" and he concludes that they are not serious about health care reform. Read Weisberg's piece here. Of course, we all knew this already, but Weisberg's piece is interesting in spite of that fact.
One might also believe that the Democrats aren't serious about health care reform either. The prominent health care reform bills have been so watered down that they barely resemble what many of us had in mind when we dreamed about reform back in January. It is easy to be disappointed in Obama's failure to lead and the Democrats' failure to show real courage and backbone in the Senate and the House. 2010 will be a dark year for Democrats indeed.
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Tell us how you really feel, Phi.
Perhaps you're aware of the possibility that some guy in Connecticut could kill health care reform in the Senate.
And perhaps you know his name: Senator Joe Lieberman.
We face a crisis in government when one man in Connecticut can stop the Democratic party from achieving its goalsin spite of the fact that democrats have through free and fair elections built commanding majorities in both houses of Congress.
President of Air America Media Mark Green discusses the problem here.
According to Green, Lieberman's only remaining argument against the public option is that it would be "an unnatural and dangerous appendage to health care reform."
If Lieberman's opposition to the public option rests on this atrocious argument, then Lieberman must be motivated by money. This is a manifestation of a structural problem with government, argues Green, and it must be addressed if we are to govern ourselves well and wisely.
How do you sleep at night, Sen. Droopy Dog? Do you have any idea how infuriating it is that some son of a bitch in Connecticut might actually deprive the people in my own state of the opportunity to decide for themselves whether they want a public option?
I hate to use this kind of language, but I think it is appropriate here:
Fuck you, Senator Joe Lieberman. Fuck you.
And perhaps you know his name: Senator Joe Lieberman.
We face a crisis in government when one man in Connecticut can stop the Democratic party from achieving its goalsin spite of the fact that democrats have through free and fair elections built commanding majorities in both houses of Congress.
President of Air America Media Mark Green discusses the problem here.
According to Green, Lieberman's only remaining argument against the public option is that it would be "an unnatural and dangerous appendage to health care reform."
If Lieberman's opposition to the public option rests on this atrocious argument, then Lieberman must be motivated by money. This is a manifestation of a structural problem with government, argues Green, and it must be addressed if we are to govern ourselves well and wisely.
How do you sleep at night, Sen. Droopy Dog? Do you have any idea how infuriating it is that some son of a bitch in Connecticut might actually deprive the people in my own state of the opportunity to decide for themselves whether they want a public option?
I hate to use this kind of language, but I think it is appropriate here:
Fuck you, Senator Joe Lieberman. Fuck you.
"America without a Middle Class"
Elizabeth Warren is Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law at Harvard University and Chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel created to oversee the banking bailouts. Read her essay "America without a Middle Class" here.
Labels:
Elizabeth Warren
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Search This Blog
Followers
What I'm Following
-
-
Is This Battle Royale?1 day ago
-
-
-
the best laid plans1 year ago
-
-
-
-
-
This feed has moved and will be deleted soon. Please update your subscription now.3 years ago
-
Believe4 years ago
-
Search4 years ago
-
10 years of aboombong5 years ago
-
-
The Blog Moves On7 years ago
-
Soup has moved and improved!!!8 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
Announcing INSIGHT at Skeptic.com10 years ago
-
80 - Somewhere, someone13 years ago
-
-
-
For your further edification and amusement
- Catan
- Collative Learning: Film Reviews and Analysis by Rob Ager
- DGM Live
- Gospel of Inclusion
- Green Party of the United States
- Mystery Science Theater 3000
- Pandora Radio
- Prog Archives
- Rip Rowan, "Over The Limit"
- Skepticblog: Ten Major Flaws of Evolution: A Refutation
- Slate Magazine
- Slayage: The Online International Journal of Buffy Studies
- South Park Studios
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Star Trek
- Teeccino
- The Baseball Scorecard
- The Onion
- The World's Biggest Pac-Man
- Turn Me Up!
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. ---W.K. Clifford
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear. ---Thomas Jefferson
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear. ---Thomas Jefferson